Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 277 trials
NCT06355050
In this prospective, multi-center cohort study, the tolerability and quality of life during ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) of early stage prostate cancer is surveyed at several institutions in Germany. Radiotherapy is delivered by an online-adaptive RT device (Varian Ethos), which is able to correct daily variations in anatomy and to adjust the irradiation plan accordingly. A digital patient questionnaire is used to asses quality of life longitudinally. Quality of life (QoL) and toxicity profiles will be correlated with planning parameters and compared to retrospective cohorts of patients who underwent normofractionated RT or moderately hypofractionated RT, respectively.
NCT05941741
This is a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled phase III clinical trial in primary diagnosed loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with low-dose radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus IC+CCRT, and compare the treatment-related adverse events and quality of life in two groups.
NCT07300631
Recently, concerns have been raised by regulators that there is little data about the long-term safety of rectal hydrogel spacers for use in conjunction with radiotherapy treatment for prostate cancer. To address this, this study will collect data about the short-term side-effects and long-term safety of SpaceOAR and SpaceOAR Vue rectal hydrogel spacers in men who receive them in the UK and France. Men who have agreed to receive these spacers as part of their standard medical care will be asked to take part in the study whereby data about their treatment and health will be collected from their medical records and from members of the clinical team who deliver their treatment. Additionally, men will be asked to consent to completing questionnaires about their experiences of side effects from their treatment. Further information will be collected about their clinical characteristics before they receive a spacer, the physician-rated clinical performance of the spacer insertion procedure, their radiotherapy treatment plan and details of the other treatments they are also receiving which could influence the types and extent of side effects they experience. Data collection will span eight time points: pre-spacer insertion, spacer insertion, the start of radiotherapy, post-radiotherapy follow-up, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up, 24-month follow-up \& 36-month follow-ups. Outside of these timepoints treatment-related adverse event data will be concurrently reported and collated. Participants' treatments will not be changed as a result of their participation in this study. Data from this study will be used to summarise the characteristics of this study population, physicians' perceptions of the spacer implantation procedure, the radiotherapy treatments plans made, and the types, extent and timing of treatment-related adverse events and side effects.
NCT07571356
Patients who underwent head and neck radiotherapy and developed xerostomia and/or hyposalivation will be selected. The patients will be randomly assigned into two groups, defined as control and treatment. All patients will complete the xerostomia-related quality of life questionnaires, XeQoLS (Xerostomia Quality of Life Scale) and OHIP (Oral Health Impact Profile). This qualitative assessment will be repeated 1 week after the 6th application and 1 week after the 12th application (T0, T6, and T12). The quantitative assessment will be carried out through the collection of unstimulated and stimulated saliva at the same time points (T0, T6, and T12). Patients will undergo 12 sessions of ozone therapy, once a week, in gaseous form, at a concentration of 10 µg/mL (micrograms per milliliter), applied directly into the major salivary glands. The gas will be administered as follows: * Parotid glands: two distinct points per gland, 1 mL at each point. * Submandibular glands: one point per gland, 1 mL per point at 10 µg/mL. * Sublingual glands: one point per gland, 1 mL per point at 10 µg/mL. The ozone generator equipment will be supplied with medical oxygen (99.5% purity), Dental model, Philozon company. Disposable syringes will be Terumo, 10 mL, and the needle will be BD, 30/13 mm.
NCT07040956
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant low-dose radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy versus targeted therapy and immunotherapy alone in patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
NCT05308732
This study aims to propose an alternative and auxiliary methodology for the prevention and treatment of Oral Mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing radiotherapy or radio and chemotherapy for head and neck neoplasms through the use of copaiba-based mouthwash, since the treatment that currently has proven efficacy for the prevention of OM(Low Power Laser Therapy) cannot be applied in tumor regions due to the risk of stimulating the tissue proliferation of malignant cells.
NCT07365124
The aim of this study is to learn whether using MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scans to plan radiotherapy is better than using CT (computed tomography) scans alone. The main questions it aims to answer is: * Can MRI scan images be adjusted to make the tumour and normal tissues easier to see? * Does adding MRI to a radiotherapy planning CT make the radiotherapy plan more precise? * Can MRI be used to adjust a radiotherapy plan during a course of treatment to make it more precise, and might that reduce the side effects? * Are there particular MRI scans that can predict how a tumour will respond to radiotherapy or how likely the patient is to have side effects? This study will assess current MRI scanning procedures and ensure these are adjusted to best suit radiotherapy planning. It will also provide pilot data evaluating: 1. MRI-adapted radiotherapy Usually, radiotherapy plans are based on a pre-treatment planning CT scan. Unless an issue is detected the patient would complete their whole course of radiotherapy on this plan. This does not account for changes in position/size/shape of the tumour that occur over the whole treatment course. Clinicians therefore increase the size of the tumour/target to account for these uncertainties, which can increase side effects. This study will assess the potential to reduce side effects from radiotherapy by using repeat MRI scans and replanning during the treatment course (MRI-adaptive radiotherapy). 2. Imaging biomarkers MRI sequences can be used to predict response to radiotherapy or chance of developing side effects. This study will identify potential MRI sequences that may be used as imaging biomarkers, to guide the development of future clinical trials. The study will be undertaken at SBUHB, lasting 4 years, and involving ≤15 healthy volunteers and ≤150 patients.
NCT03972072
Radiotherapy is the main treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Many advances regarding tumor control and patient survival have been made over the past decades. However, treatment-induced toxicity remains a crucial problem, leading to reduced quality of life and permanent impairment for many survivors. Xerostomia is up to this day the leading cause of late toxicity for these patients. Toxicity has been reduced by implementation of modern image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), but the low soft-tissue contrast of routine x-ray image guidance does not allow exact planning adaptation and daily imaging is associated with high radiation exposure. Furthermore, despite the routinely use of IMRT, rates of clinically relevant xerostomia (i.e. grade 2 or worse) are still common and reported in approximately 38%. Recently developed hybrid machines (MRidian®-CE approval since 2016), consisting of a linear accelerator and an integrated low-field MRI, could allow a) better visualization of tumor and organs at risk, such as parotid glands during patient positioning and daily treatment, b) daily imaging without additional radiation exposure, c) narrowest established safety margins for the treatment volumes, and finally d) repetitive adaptation of target volumes according to changes in patient weight and tumor anatomy during the radiotherapy course. These procedures would facilitate a high-precision treatment and help reduce dose exposure of critical structures.
NCT06167291
To test a new radiation treatment design based on where your cancer is located. Most participants with oropharyngeal cancer are treated with radiation to both sides of the neck. However, for participants with oropharyngeal cancer on one side of the neck, receiving radiation to both sides of the neck may result in increased side effects and radiation exposure. This study is testing the safety and effectiveness of an approach that involves radiation to only one side of the neck in an effort to reduce the overall amount of radiation given and decrease the amount of side effects you may experience.
NCT07404228
Rectal cancer presents a significant global health challenge. Despite improvements in clinical outcomes, significant disparities persist across Europe. These differences are explained not only by the heterogeneity of risk factors and screening strategies, but also by variations in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, which are highly dependent on medical imaging. Standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer based on staging MRI is neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), for tumour downsizing and downstaging, followed by total mesorectal excision. In a significant proportion of cases, radical surgery leads to substantial long-term complications like sexual and urinary dysfunction, fecal incontinence, and impairment in daily activities. Given that up to 42% of patients show complete tumor regression at pathology (i.e. pathological complete response pCR), to avoid unnecessary radical surgery, non-operative management has become an attractive alternative when there are no signs of viable tumour after NAT (i.e. clinical complete response cCR). Such patients are candidates for Watch-and-Wait (W\&W), an established active surveillance policy in specialized centers worldwide relying on clinical examination, endoscopy and MRI. On the other hand, W\&W carries a risk of local regrowth (persistence of microscopic residual disease despite apparent cCR). Even in expert hands, assessment of tumor response is not perfect and local regrowth based on current selection methods occurs in \~30% of cases. Although deferred surgery is a successful treatment with no apparent negative impact on local disease control, an increased rate of distant metastases has been recently reported. Therefore, there is a critical unmet clinical need to detect complete responses after NAT and avoid unnecessary surgery with its associated morbidity and quality of life impairment risks, while also improving sensitivity for residual microscopic disease that will result in local regrowth and associated reduced disease-free survival. Rectal cancer poses a burden not only on healthcare systems, but also on patient well-being. Patients frequently suffer from feelings of isolation and helplessness when faced with unpredicted disease-related situations, given the common difficulties to access high quality information and communicate with attending physicians. As such, there is a clear need to unburden healthcare facilities from unnecessary hospital visits, while improving patient outcomes, engagement, support and care.
NCT07138755
To evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Sintilimab With Platinum-doublet Chemotherapy and Adaptive Radiotherapy Strategy in the Treatment of Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
NCT07339774
Evaluate the effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine compound in improving radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with head and neck malignant tumors.
NCT07332000
Phase 2a, open-label, multi-center study evaluating biomarkers and biodistribution of aglatimagene besadenovec plus valacyclovir in men with localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer who are planning to receive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).
NCT07481786
This is a phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing two brain-directed treatment strategies for adult patients with extensive brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma. The trial compares fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy combined with bevacizumab (FSRT-Bev) versus hippocampus-avoidant whole-brain radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT-SIB). The main objectives are to evaluate intracranial tumor control and preservation of neurocognitive function . Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either FSRT plus bevacizumab or HA-WBRT-SIB. In the experimental group, FSRT is delivered to visible brain tumors over 5 daily treatments (total 30 Gy, 6 Gy per fraction). Bevacizumab is given intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. In the control group, patients receive hippocampus-avoidant whole-brain radiation (25 Gy) with a simultaneous dose boost to metastatic lesions (40 Gy total) over 10 daily treatments.
NCT07469267
The RELAX trial is an open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial. Multiple randomized trials have demonstrated the safety of omitting complete axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with invasive breast cancer and limited sentinel lymph node metastases. However, the necessity and optimal extent of regional nodal irradiation remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether level I-II axillary irradiation is non-inferior to whole regional nodal irradiation in terms of disease-free survival in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel lymph node macro-metastases.
NCT07467590
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a high- and low-dose radiotherapy regimen followed by anti-angiogenic TKI and anti-PD-1 antibody therapy works to treat advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. It will also evaluate long-term survival outcomes and explore potential biomarkers associated with tumor response and immune modulation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the high- and low-dose radiotherapy regimen followed by sequential anti-angiogenic TKI and anti-PD-1 therapy improve the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer? What are the disease control rate (DCR) and survival outcomes following this treatment strategy? Are tumor response and long-term survival associated with specific biomarkers related to systemic immune modulation induced by radiotherapy to different metastatic organs? How does this radiotherapy pattern affect tumor immune infiltration in metastatic lesions? This is a single-arm, single-center, prospective Phase II clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a high- and low-dose radiotherapy regimen targeting metastatic lesions followed by sequential anti-angiogenic TKI and anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. Participants will: Receive high- and low-dose radiotherapy to metastatic lesions. Subsequently receive anti-angiogenic TKI combined with anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. Undergo regular clinical assessments and imaging evaluations to determine tumor response. Provide blood and tumor samples for biomarker and immune infiltration analysis. Be followed for survival outcomes and disease progression.
NCT06719440
The objective of the BELGICA trial is to evaluate if radiotherapy could be given in a more focused manner in patients with glioblastoma in order to reduce side effects and improve quality of life. The glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive tumour originating from the brain, affecting approximately 600 patients per year in Belgium. The treatment consists in surgical resection of the tumour (when feasible), followed by a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite multimodal treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy), the life expectancy of patients with GBM remains limited, with an average survival of 12-18 months and only 5% of patients surviving more than 5 years. In addition to limited survival, most patients with GBM experience impaired quality of life, both because of the disease and treatments. Radiotherapy is a treatment where radiation is used to kill cancer cells. In GBM, radiotherapy is targeted at the tumour (or tumour bed if the tumour was resected) with a safety margin around it (the "Clinical Target Volume" or CTV) to account for potential microscopic spread of the tumour. The downside of this safety margin is that a substantial amount of brain tissue is irradiated, which can lead to treatment toxicity. Reducing the CTV margin would enable to decrease the volume of brain being irradiated and could thereby allow to reduce the side effects of brain irradiation. The BELGICA trial (Achieving a BEtter outcome through Limiting the GlIoblastoma Clinical tArget volume) is a national multicentre trial which will evaluate if reducing the irradiation volume in glioblastoma is safe and allows for lowering side effects and improving quality of life.
NCT06100068
In the HOBBIT-trial by Vakaet et al. A protocol was developed to increase breath-hold time using (voluntary) hyperventilation and oxygenation to achieve DIBH times around 3 minutes. Multiple non-medical interventions are being investigated to prolong a L-DIBH that are feasible in clinical practice. One of these methods will be to alter the time perception of the subjects. It has been noted in multiple studies (both medical and not) that slowing a person's perception of time results in an increase in breath-hold time. This alteration in time perception can be achieved with the use of a slowed clock as well as the usage of mental or physical exercises to preoccupy the subjects. Volunteers will then be randomised into either the standard arm or the intervention arm. The intervention arm will follow standard protocol regarding DIBH preparation, though during the L-DIBH they will be asked to perform a simple mental exercise on a tablet. After 2 sessions of 3 L-DIBHs each, there will be a cross-over to the other arm in order to ascertain comfort and preference with each technique.
NCT07325721
This study is for adult men with previously untreated high risk, very high risk, or pelvic lymph node positive prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination of two emerging radiation treatment techniques (hypofractionated radiotherapy and microboost technique). Participation will include standard of care visits along with questionnaires and blood draws completed for research purposes. There is optional banking of blood and prostate biopsy tissue which will not require extra biopsies. Participation in this study is anticipated to last approximately 6 weeks with follow up every three months for two years then twice yearly for years 3-5.
NCT06778408
This is a prospective single-center single-arm Phase II trial of HART for patients with metastatic cancer. The primary objective is to assess the incidence of acute GI toxicity following HART. PRO-CTCAE GI scores observed in the study patients will be compared to historical rates. Secondary outcomes include measuring changes in health-related quality of life, esophageal quality of life, toxicity, dosimetric outcomes, and pain.