Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-8 of 8 trials
NCT07320092
Atelectasis frequently develops during and after general anesthesia due to factors such as anesthesia-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction, reduced functional residual capacity, altered ventilation-perfusion matching, and surgical positioning. The development of atelectasis has been associated with postoperative hypoxemia and other pulmonary complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a reliable, radiation-free bedside imaging modality for the detection and monitoring of atelectasis. LUS allows assessment of lung aeration through standardized ultrasound patterns and scoring systems, enabling dynamic evaluation in the perioperative period. This is a prospective, observational cohort study designed to compare the incidence and severity of atelectasis in patients undergoing surgery in the supine position versus the prone position under general anesthesia. Adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures will be enrolled. No experimental intervention will be applied, and all anesthetic and surgical management will follow routine clinical practice. Lung ultrasound examinations will be performed at predefined time points after induction of anesthesia and before extubation. A standardized lung ultrasound protocol and scoring system will be used to assess lung aeration loss and detect the presence of atelectasis. The primary outcome of the study is the difference in atelectasis detected by lung ultrasound between supine and prone surgical positions. The secondary outcome is the change in lung ultrasound scores over time. This study aims to clarify the effects of supine and prone positions on perioperative atelectasis and to support the clinical use of lung ultrasound as a noninvasive monitoring tool in perioperative and anesthetic practice..
NCT07186920
Brief summary The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two different types of perioperative mechanical ventilation (MV), specifically Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) and MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP), in relation to the appearance of postoperative lung closing, eg atelectasis, in adult patients who are operated. Atelectasis will be evaluated via lung ultrasound. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is MV with lower ΔP better than conventional PMV in keeping lungs more open perioperatively and immediately postoperatively? * Does MV with lower ΔP decrease hospital stay, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) need and mortality? Researchers will use lung ultrasound to compare MV with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP) to Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV) to see if any of this is more protective than the other concerning lung atelectasis. All participants will receive perioperative MV. Half of them will receive conventional Protective Mechanical Ventilation (PMV). This will include well known generally protective settings for mechanical ventilation of patients, concerning volumes, pressures, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. The rest of participants will be ventilated with the lowest possible Driving Pressure (ΔP). This will be similar to PMV in the chosen volumes, respiratory rate, inspiratory gases and ventilation maneuvers. However, the pressure inside lung at the end of expiration, eg Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), will be not be preset for every patient. Initially, we will perform a maneuver that will quantify each individual's lung characteristics and mechanics. According to this, we will find the exact PEEP that seems to suit each patients lungs most, and use this perioperatively, trying to provide lungs the best conditions every time. After the completion of the operation, all the patients will be screened for atelectasis, via lung ultrasound, using a well established protocol for the quantification of atelectasis. The results will be statistically analyzed trying to find if any of the forementioned strategies of mechanical ventilation surpasses the other concerning atelectasis appearance. Furthermore efficiency of lung oxygen absorption, hospital stay, ICU need and mortality will be noted.
NCT06554678
This study aims to explore the clinical effect of THRIVE in improving early postoperative atelectasis in patients undergoing long-term non-intubated anesthesia gastrointestinal endoscopy.
NCT03828513
Evaluate the effects of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy on atelectasis in the perioperative period by lung ultrasound (LUS) in bariatric surgery patients.
NCT06115668
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPIND) titration, compared to fixed positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O, on oxygenation, hemodynamic variables, and early postoperative complications in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
NCT03856918
Protective ventilation strategy has been widely applied in the field of thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. Low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and intermittent recruitment maneuver are key components of protective ventilation strategy. Recent evidence suggests that a tidal volume of 4-5 ml/kg should be applied during protective one-lung ventilation. However, optimal level of PEEP is still unclear. This study aims to investigate optimal level of PEEP to minimize postoperative atelectasis by comparing modified lung ultrasound score in patients applied protective one-lung ventilation using PEEP of 3, 6, or 9 cm of water during thoracic surgery.
NCT04253834
This study compares a novel breathing device, called the GO2 Mouthpiece, to the standard breathing tool called the incentive spirometer, thus improving respiratory dynamics of the postoperative patient.
NCT04169607
This study intends to explore the effect of dynamic compliance guided individualized positive end-expiratory pressure titration strategy on reducing the level of postoperative atelectasis in obese patient who have laparoscopic bariatric surgery.The results of the study are to assess the effects of this intervention on the incidence，duration of postoperative atelectasis and other complications including hypoxemia etc. after laparoscopic bariatric surgery.And reducing the burden of postoperative atelectasis on patients and their families, hospitals and public resources.