Loading clinical trials...
Loading clinical trials...
Showing 1-20 of 7,879 trials
NCT03712527
Low back pain (LBP) is the second cause of medical visits in France. Indeed, its incidence can vary between 60 and 90%. LBP is also the leading cause of disability in the adult population in France and in the rest of the world. Its evolution towards chronicity is observed in less than 8% of cases, but it is responsible for 85% of the medical costs. Degenerative disk disease (DDD) is a major cause of chronic LBP (\> 40%). DDD can be characterized by peculiar Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) features with a strong correlation between pain and inflammatory aspect of the disk, which result in the so-called active discopathy (AD) (Brinjikji et al. 2015). Modic classification based on MRI of the lumbar spine is considered as a reference. Type 1 Modic signal changes are characterised by a low-intensity signal on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintense signal on T2-weighted sequences, with gadolinium injection enhancement, corresponding to bone marrow oedema. Type 1 Modic is very rare in an asymptomatic population but may be found in 5% to 40% of chronic LBP patients underscoring its symptomatic involvement. No currently reference treatment is available for AD. PRP technology has recently been widely developed in osteoarthritis and tendon injuries. Therapeutic benefit of PRP has being evaluated. For instance, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have specifically evaluated the effect of PRP in AD (Modic 1 signal). The availability of PRP for intra- discal injection could become an innovative therapeutic option in humans, especially for AD forms where inflammatory process is clearly predominant. The objective of the study is to evaluate the 3-month efficacy on pain and function (by achieving 30% improvement in Oswestry Disability Index) of one intra-discal PRP injection versus placebo (saline solution) in subjects with LBP associated with AD lasting more than 3 months.
NCT07589491
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block- related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
NCT07590050
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if catgut embedding works to treat chronic low back pain in adults with lumbar spondylosis and "Blood Stasis" syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does catgut embedding lower back pain more effectively than electro-acupuncture? Does catgut embedding improve the daily physical activities of participants? Researchers will compare catgut embedding to electro-acupuncture to see which method works better to reduce pain and improve quality of life. All participants will also receive counseling on lifestyle changes and back exercises. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either catgut embedding (2 sessions over 4 weeks) or electro-acupuncture (20 sessions over 4 weeks). Visit the clinic for treatments and checkups. Complete surveys about their pain levels and ability to perform daily tasks at the start, at 2 weeks, and at 4 weeks.
NCT06885931
Exploratory safety and feasibility study of personalized adaptive pudendal neuromodulation for mixed urinary incontinence and extended indications using an implanted (Picostim™ II) system.
NCT07377877
This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB) and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia in adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Both EOIB and ESPB are ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques currently used in clinical practice to improve postoperative pain control as part of multimodal analgesia strategies. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common minimally invasive surgical procedure; however, patients may still experience postoperative pain that can increase opioid consumption and delay recovery. Identifying the most effective regional anesthesia technique may improve postoperative analgesia and patient recovery. In this study, eligible patients will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral EOIB or bilateral ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications will be evaluated during the first 24 hours after surgery. The study aims to provide comparative clinical evidence regarding the analgesic effectiveness of these two regional anesthesia techniques.
NCT06834243
This retrospective study evaluates the effects of two different administration methods of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block on postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, and recovery in patients undergoing hip surgery. All patients in the study received: * PENG block via a catheter * Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with tramadol * Multimodal analgesia, including IV paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as rescue analgesia The study compares two groups: 1. Intermittent Bolus Group: A researcher administered 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine every 4 hours. 2. Continuous Infusion Group: A pump delivered 5 mL/hour of 0.25% bupivacaine continuously. Both groups received the same total volume of local anesthetic over 24 hours. All PENG blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance at the end of surgery. This study aims to determine whether intermittent bolus or continuous infusion PENG block administration leads to better pain control, lower opioid consumption, and improved recovery outcomes.
NCT05602038
The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of CPSCP in patients receiving QLB quadratus lumborum block and ITM versus control as a primary outcome and associated risk factors that might predispose patients to develop CPSCP.
NCT07579572
This randomized prospective study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block and standard local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing port catheter implantation.
NCT07586436
This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effects of stress ball use and breathing exercises on procedural pain and vital signs during drain removal in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Although drain removal is a short procedure, it is often associated with sudden and intense pain and may trigger physiological stress responses such as increased heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate. A total of 105 patients will be randomly assigned to three groups: stress ball group, breathing exercise group, and standard care group. The interventions will be applied starting one minute before drain removal, continuing throughout the procedure, and for two minutes afterward. Pain levels will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) will be measured at predefined time points before, during, and after the procedure. The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness of simple, non-pharmacological interventions in reducing procedural pain and improving physiological stability during drain removal
NCT07064993
Patients scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy under general anesthesia will be randomly assigned into three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: placebo (saline), tramadol, and tramadol plus dexamethasone. At the end of surgery, after aspiration of the irrigation fluid, the study solution will be administered intraarticularly in a standardized volume. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) of VAS scores measured at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (VAS AUC 0-24h). Secondary outcomes include time to first analgesic requirement, total analgesic consumption within 24 hours, and the incidence of adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, itching, and shivering. This study aims to determine whether intraarticular tramadol provides effective postoperative analgesia and whether the addition of dexamethasone enhances this analgesic effect.
NCT06516770
This study aims to determine the effect of different stimulations including 1) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), 2) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), 3) motor control exercise (MCE), and 4) isometric exercise (IE) on movement control and motor unit behavior in individuals with movement control impairment, and determine the correlation between movement control and motor unit behavior.
NCT07573033
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of postoperative topical antibiotics compared with oral antibiotics in patients undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. The study aims to compare postoperative outcomes including infection, dry socket, pain, swelling, recovery time, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects associated with antibiotic use. A total of 90 participants undergoing mandibular third molar surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either topical antibiotic application at the surgical site or a standard postoperative course of oral antibiotics. Participants will be followed for 14 days after surgery with clinical assessments conducted at scheduled follow-up visits. Detailed Description: Impacted mandibular third molar extraction is one of the most commonly performed oral surgical procedures and is frequently associated with postoperative complications such as pain, swelling, infection, and alveolar osteitis (dry socket). Antibiotics are commonly prescribed after third molar surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative infections; however, routine systemic antibiotic use may contribute to adverse drug reactions and antibiotic resistance. Topical antibiotic application at the surgical site may offer localized antimicrobial effects while reducing systemic exposure and related complications. This study is a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan. The study duration is six months from February 2024 to July 2024. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry (REF.No.IRB/D-000090/24), and written informed consent is obtained from all participants before enrollment. A total of 90 participants aged 18 to 40 years undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars are enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two treatment groups using computerized block randomization with allocation concealment through sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. Participants in the experimental group receive topical antibiotic application directly at the extraction site immediately after surgery, while participants in the comparator group receive a standard 5-day postoperative oral antibiotic regimen according to institutional protocol. All surgical procedures are performed under local anesthesia using standardized surgical techniques by qualified oral surgeons. Follow-up evaluations are conducted on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 14 to assess postoperative outcomes. The primary outcomes include postoperative infection and dry socket incidence. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), facial swelling, patient satisfaction, recovery time, and adverse effects related to antibiotic therapy. Data are analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Descriptive statistics are used to summarize demographic and clinical variables. Comparative analyses between groups are performed using appropriate statistical tests, including chi-square tests for categorical variables, with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.
NCT04338893
This is a prospective, multicenter clinical study designed to facilitate the collection and evaluation of surgical workflow efficiency, patient pain and function outcome and adverse events data. This study might include Persona, Nexgen and Vanguard product families using the ROSA Total Knee Robotic system or conventional instrumentation. The primary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of implant alignment for ROSA Total Knee robotic instrumentation compared to conventional instrumentation.
NCT05805423
This is a single center, prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of bilateral superficial cervical plexus blocks (BSCPB) with local wound infiltration vs placebo with local wound infiltration in reducing thyroid surgery postoperative pain. Primary outcomes assessed are post operative pain, quality of life/recovery, post operative nausea/vomiting and opioid use.
NCT06855732
The goal of this study is to learn if Pain Self-Management (PSM) can improve chronic pain care in individuals with opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD) The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does PSM help participants manage their chronic pain more effectively? * Does PSM help participants engage in treatment for opioid use? Researchers will compare PSM to standard care to see if PSM is effective in managing chronic pain and engagement in treatment. Participants will: * Take part in the PSM program or receive standard care for 12 weeks after enrolling in the study * Complete surveys every 3 months for 9 months (total of 4 visits) Participants will receive compensation for participating in the study. There are risks associated with participating in the study, including breach of confidentiality and psychological distress caused by discussing difficult topics.
NCT07577908
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane (SPSIP) block compared to Intercostal Nerve (ICN) block in terms of postoperative pain control, reduction of opioid analgesic consumption, minimization of postoperative respiratory complications, and increase patient satisfaction (using a 5-point Likert scale) in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
NCT07571902
After stoma closure, pain remains an important problem affecting patient recovery. A revised paravertebral block (r-PVB) was developed as a single-shot, large-volume intercostal-space injection performed at the exposed mid-axillary ninth to eleventh intercostal level with the patient kept supine after induction of anesthesia. Rather than puncturing the classical paraspinal target near the transverse process with the patient in a prone or lateral position, the r-PVB technique is designed to exploit retrograde spread of local anesthetic from the intercostal space to the paravertebral space, thereby generating a functional paravertebral block while avoiding direct entry into the paravertebral space and the need for specific body positioning. The r-PVB technique addresses several practical limitations of conventional PVB by eliminating the need to reposition an anesthetized patient, using a more accessible and potentially clearer sonographic window, reducing interference from transverse-process shadowing, and facilitating in-plane needle visualization.
NCT07577297
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effects of neuromuscular taping on cervical pain and health-related quality of life in climacteric women with non-specific chronic neck pain. Two taping techniques ("Y-strip" and "star-shape") will be compared with a control group receiving no intervention. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of three groups following concealed allocation. The interventions will be applied to the cervicodorsal region (centered at C7) by an experienced physiotherapist over a 3-week period, with taping changes performed weekly. A 4-week total follow-up period will be included. Primary and secondary outcomes will assess pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, cervical disability, cranio-cervical angle, pain perception, body satisfaction, and health-related quality of life. Measurements will be collected at baseline, weekly during the intervention, and at one-week post-intervention follow-up. The study is designed to provide evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of two non-invasive neuromuscular taping approaches in the management of chronic non-specific cervical pain in middle-aged women.
NCT07244237
The goal of this observational study is to investigate the correlation between self-reported pain and the measurements obtained using an artificial intelligence-assisted whole-body electrical stimulation device (StimaWELL 120MTRS system) in individuals with chronic back pain. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there any correlation between the pain intensity assessed with StimaWELL 120MTRS system, dolorimeter and self-report in adults with chronic back pain? The patients who have back pain for the duration longer than 3 months and have been eximaned by a medical doctor will be assessed with StimaWELL 120MTRS system, dolorimeter, and will be asked to rate their pain intensity in Numerical Pain Rating Scale.
NCT05310695
The Norwegian Sickness Absence Clinic (NSAC) is a publicly funded specialist outpatient health service, which is uniquely available for the work force. The overall aim of the NSAC is prevention of sickness absence, promote return to work (RTW) among those on sickness absence and prevent long term disability benefit dependency. In addition to being a health service, the NSAC has a focus on work and functional recovery, including also non-health related factors. Patients can be referred by general practitioners for mental health problems and musculoskeletal problems. The NSAC has a lower threshold for severity than specialist health services generally, and in particular for mental health problems. The efficacy of this service is unknown. The NSAC Efficacy Study is a randomized controlled multicentre trial which aims to assess the effect of the NSAC service. "Helse i Arbeid" is the Norwegian name for NSAC, and the Norwegian abbreviation is "HiA". The Norwegian study name is HIANOR. The NSAC Efficacy Study involves five different NSACs across northern Norway, and will recruit 2500 patients, randomized to in equal proportions to three treatment arms: 1. NSAC - rapid: treatment at the NSAC at- or within 4 weeks 2. NSAC - ordinary: treatment at the NSAC after 10-14 weeks 3. NSAC - active control: monodisciplinary examination at the NSAC close to diagnosis-specific deadline for examination as suggested by guidelines (8-26 weeks, the majority at the end of this interval) The overall aim is to assess the effect of the NSAC service, with the hypothesis that the NSAC service is superior to what resembles treatment as usual (TAU) for outcomes such as return to work or improved health (waiting list control). Many of the diagnoses or problems for which patients are referred to the NSACs naturally improve regardless of health interventions, and - as of date - no research has been conducted to assess the efficacy of the service.