Loading clinical trials...
Discover 17,345 clinical trials near Tennessee. Find research studies in your area.
Browse by condition:
Showing 2941-2960 of 17,345 trials
NCT05743881
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1365, an mRNA vaccine targeting respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and mRNA-1345, an mRNA vaccine targeting RSV, in participants aged 5 months to \<24 months.
NCT05642312
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of vamikibart in participants with uveitic macular edema.
NCT05668585
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CFT1946 as well as to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CFT1946 as monotherapy (Arm A) and in combination with trametinib (CFT1946 + trametinib; Arm B) or Cetuximab (CFT1946 + cetuximab; Arm C).
NCT05914116
This is a dose-escalation and dose-expansion Phase 1/2a trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DB-1311/BNT324 in subjects with advanced solid tumors.
NCT05813275
This is a Phase 3 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled 6-month Parallel-Arm Study to Compare a Fixed Dose Combination of AD109 to Placebo in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
NCT05838755
This is a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and target engagement of GSK3858279 in adult participants with chronic Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPNP). The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of GSK3858279 in participants with DPNP who have been unable to sufficiently manage their pain.
NCT03383458
This study will investigate if nivolumab will improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to placebo in participants with HCC who have undergone complete resection or have achieved a complete response after local ablation, and who are at high risk of recurrence
NCT05723835
The purpose of this study is to find out if somapacitan is safe and how well somapacitan works in children either born small for gestational age or with Turner syndrome, Noonan syndrome or idiopathic short stature. Somapacitan is a new growth hormone medicine for treatment of low level of growth hormone. The study will last for about 3 years. During the study, the participants will be treated with somapacitan once a week. Somapacitan can be injected anytime during the day. The study doctor or nurse will show how to inject somapacitan, so that the participant knows how to do it at home.
NCT05843578
Many patients with Crohn's disease develop fibrotic narrowing (strictures) in their bowel, causing obstructive symptoms such as abdominal pain, cramping, or vomiting after meals. Because of these symptoms, patients often require bowel resection surgery. The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AGMB-129 in patients with Crohn's disease and symptomatic strictures, and whether it can have a beneficial effect on intestinal strictures. The participants will be in the Part A for a duration of up to 19 weeks including a 5 week screening period, a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, and 2 week safety follow up period. Participants who continue to Part B can receive treatment for up to an additional 48 weeks, with a safety follow-up visit 2 weeks after the last dose of treatment.
NCT03740334
This research study is evaluating a drug called ribociclib (LEE011) given in combination with everolimus and other standard of care chemotherapy drugs as a possible treatment for relapsed or refractory ALL. The names of the drugs involved in this study are: * ribociclib * everolimus * dexamethasone
NCT04223193
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of flexible doses of tavapadon in participants with Parkinson's Disease.
NCT06538064
The main aims of this study are to understand why adults with Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) chose a certain treatment, why they changed to HyQvia from another therapy, how satisfied they are with HyQvia and their previous treatment, how their work productivity and activity is impacted and learn about their CIDP signs and symptoms. Other aims are to collect information on any medical problems or side effects during the treatment with HyQvia, learn how effective treatment of CIDP with HyQvia is and understand details on the use of HyQvia in standard clinical routine as well on the need for healthcare intervention (such as emergency room visits or hospital visits or stays). During the study, data will be collected from medical records already available, interviews with participants at study start and study completion and via questionnaires completed by participants. Participants will be treated as per the doctor's or the clinic's routine.
NCT05753748
The purpose of this study is to learn the best approach to treating patients with known or suspected Barrett's esophagus by comparing endoscopic surveillance to endoscopic eradication therapy. To diagnose and manage Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia, doctors commonly use procedures called endoscopic surveillance and endoscopic eradication therapy. Endoscopic surveillance is a type of procedure where a physician will run a tube with a light and a camera on the end of it down the patients throat and remove a small piece of tissue. The piece of tissue, called a biopsy, is about the size of the tip of a ball-point pen and is checked for abnormal cells and cancer cells. Endoscopic eradication therapy is a kind of surgery which is performed to destroy the precancerous cells at the bottom of the esophagus, so that healthy cells can grow in their place. It involves procedures to either remove precancerous tissue or burn it. These procedures can have side effects, so it is not certain whether risking those side effects is worth the benefit people get from the treatments. While both of these procedures are widely accepted approaches to managing the condition, there is not enough research to show if one is better than the other. Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia does not always worsen to high-grade dysplasia and/or cancer. In fact, it usually does not. So, if a patient's dysplasia is not worsening, doctors would rather not put patients at risk unnecessarily. On the other hand, endoscopic eradication therapy could possibly prevent the worsening of low-grade dysplasia into high-grade dysplasia or cancer (esophageal adenocarcinoma) in some patients. Researchers believe that the results of this study will help doctors choose the safest and most effective procedure for their patients with Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia. This is a multicenter study involving several academic, community and private hospitals around the United States. Up to 530 participants will be randomized. This study will also include a prospective observational cohort study of up to 150 Barrett's esophagus and low grade dysplasia patients who decline randomization in the randomized control trial but undergo endoscopic surveillance (Cohort 1) or endoscopic eradication therapy (Cohort 2), and are willing to provide longitudinal observational data.
NCT03532295
In this study, the investigators propose to combine retifanlimab with radiation therapy (RT) and bevacizumab with or without epacadostat in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). The investigators hypothesize that this combination provides a powerful synergy between RT and immune modulators to produce more robust anti-tumor immune response, induce tumor regression and improve overall survival.
NCT04590326
This study is researching an investigational drug called REGN5668 : * alone or, * combined with cemiplimab (also known as REGN2810) or, * combined with both cemiplimab and fianlimab (also known as REGN3767), or * combined with ubamatamab (also known as REGN4018), with or without sarilumab. The main purposes of this study are to: * Learn about the safety and profile of any side effects from the study drugs and to determine the highest, safe dose that can be given to participants with ovarian cancer or cancer of the uterus * Look for signs that the study drugs can treat ovarian cancer or cancer of the uterus This study has 2 parts. The purpose of Part 1 (Escalation) is to find the highest, safe dose of the study drug(s). The purpose of Part 2 (Expansion) is to use the doses chosen in Part 1. Participants with cancer of the uterus will only participate in Part 2. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: * Side effects that may be experienced by participants taking REGN5668 alone and/or in combination with cemiplimab, cemiplimab and fianlimab, or ubamatamab * How REGN5668 works in the body either alone and/or in combination with cemiplimab, cemiplimab and fianlimab, or ubamatamab * How much of the study drugs (REGN5668, cemiplimab, fianlimab, ubamatamab) are in the blood * To see if REGN5668 in combination with cemiplimab, cemiplimab and fianlimab, or ubamatamab works to treat cancer
NCT04918173
The goal of this study is to assess the incidence of the composite of thrombotic events (TEs) and thromboembolic events (TEEs) in patients with congenital antithrombin deficiency under when they receive Atenativ for surgical procedures or parturition.
NCT02999009
The purpose of this study is to review the performance and success rate of an FDA approved cementless hip replacement part called the Trident II Tritanium Acetabular Shell. The study will specifically look at the need to revise the hip replacement after 5 years. This will be compared to how much this happens in patients who have hip replacement with similar cementless acetabular shells.
NCT06597019
This is a pivotal phase III study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of inclisiran in children (aged 6 to \<12 years) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC).
NCT05989269
The goal of this pragmatic cluster-randomized crossover trial is to test if less unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed when the lab reports respiratory culture test results in a specific way for patients who have respiratory cultures obtained, but do not meet clinical criteria for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). The main question it aims to answer is: Does a modified culture reporting intervention reduce unnecessary antibiotics for ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)? Researchers will compare antibiotic use outcomes between eligible patients whose test results are communicated using the modified reporting and those with standard reporting of results.
NCT06488209
The main purpose of this study is to to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity of LAD191 in healthy adults and in adults with an autoimmune disease.
