Loading clinical trials...
Discover 14,395 clinical trials near Arizona. Find research studies in your area.
Browse by condition:
Showing 1401-1420 of 14,395 trials
NCT06513962
This phase III trial compares the effect of giving triptorelin vs no triptorelin in preventing ovarian damage in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer receiving chemotherapy with an alkylating agents. Alkylating agents are part of standard chemotherapy, but may cause damage to the ovaries. If the ovaries are not working well or completely shut down, then it will be difficult or impossible to get pregnant in the future. Triptorelin works by blocking certain hormones and causing the ovaries to slow down or pause normal activity. The triptorelin used in this study stays active in the body for 24 weeks or about 6 months after a dose is given. After triptorelin is cleared from the body, the ovaries resume normal activities. Adding triptorelin before the start of chemotherapy treatment may reduce the chances of damage to the ovaries.
NCT04870944
This phase I/II trial evaluates the best dose, side effects and possible benefit of CBL0137 in treating patients with solid tumors, including central nervous system (CNS) tumors or lymphoma that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Drugs, such as CBL0137, block signals passed from one molecule to another inside a cell. Blocking these signals can affect many functions of the cell, including cell division and cell death, and may kill cancer cells.
NCT03725202
This study consists of two periods. The objective of Period 1 is to evaluate the efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with a 26-week corticosteroid (CS) taper regimen compared to placebo in combination with a 52-week CS taper regimen, as measured by the proportion of participants in sustained remission at Week 52, and to assess the safety and tolerability of upadacitinib in participants with giant cell arteritis (GCA). The objective of Period 2 is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuing versus withdrawing upadacitinib in maintaining remission in participants who achieved sustained remission in Period 1.
NCT00003641
RATIONALE: Interferon alfa may interfere with the growth of cancer cells. It is not yet known whether treatment with interferon alfa is more effective than observation alone for stage II or stage III melanoma that has been completely removed surgically. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying high dose interferon alfa to see how well it works compared to observation only in treating patients with stage II or stage III melanoma that has been completely removed by surgery.
NCT05254990
Primary objective: \- To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs. placebo in the proportion of patients dead or requiring IMV (or ECMO) by Day 28. Key secondary objectives: * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in all-cause mortality at day 180. * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in proportion of patients alive and discharged at day 28 * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in ventilatory-free days at day 28. * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in proportion of patients with IMV (or ECMO) by day 28. * To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo in length of primary hospital stay. Other efficacy objectives \- To compare the efficacy of reparixin vs placebo on several disease severity/progression measures including recovery, ventilatory free days and mortality. Safety objectives: \- To evaluate safety and tolerability of oral reparixin versus placebo in the specific clinical setting.
NCT05952869
The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of enlicitide decanoate in adult participants with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The primary hypothesis is that enlicitide decanoate is superior to placebo on mean percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 24.
NCT07123454
This is a Phase I/II open-label, global multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AZD4512 monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agent(s), in participants with Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL).
NCT06620302
This phase I/II trial tests the safety, side effects and best dose of DT2216 in combination with irinotecan and how well it works in treating children, adolescents and young adults with solid tumors and fibrolamellar cancer that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed) or that has not responded to previous treatment (refractory). DT2216 is an anti-apoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-extra large targeted protein degrader. It may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking Bcl-xL, a protein needed for tumor cell survival. Irinotecan is in a class of antineoplastic medications called topoisomerase I inhibitors. It blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and deoxyribonucleic acid repair and may kill tumor cells. Giving DT2216 in combination with irinotecan may be safe, tolerable, and/or effective in treating children, adolescents and young adults with relapsed or refractory solid tumors or fibrolamellar cancer.
NCT05564117
This study will look how well semaglutide tablets taken once daily helps people with body weight above the healthy range. Participants will either get semaglutide 25 milligram (mg) once daily or placebo once daily. This study will last for 72 weeks, which includes 1-week screening period, 64 weeks of treatment period and 7 weeks of follow up period.
NCT05589896
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the safety and feasibility of allogeneic transplantation with bone marrow from a deceased donor in patients with acute and chronic leukemias, myelodysplastic syndrome, and certain lymphomas. Patients will either receive myeloablative conditioning or reduced intensity conditioning regimen prior to the transplant. Patients will be followed for 56 days for safety endpoints and remain in follow-up for one year.
NCT07219511
A Safety, Tolerability, and Biomarker Trial of VS-041 in Participants with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
NCT07216027
The purpose of this study is to learn if the study medicine (PF-08049820) is safe and effective for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, or atopic eczema. People with this condition may have severe itching and rashes on the skin. The study is seeking participants who: 1. Are 18 years of age or more; 2. Were confirmed to have AD at least 6 months ago; 3. Do not have a suitable prescribed medicine for AD; 4. Are considered by their doctors to have moderate to severe AD. Eligible participants will take either PF-08049820 or placebo as tablets by mouth daily for 12 weeks. A placebo does not have any medicine in it but looks just like the medicine being studied. Participants will visit the clinic on Day 1, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12, and have a follow-up visit at Week 16. During this time, the participant's health and skin condition will be checked. Participants will have blood and urine tests and must answer questions about their health, skin condition, and how much their skin condition affects their lives. The experiences of participants receiving the study medicine will be compared to participants receiving placebo. This will help to understand if PF-08049820 is safe and effective.
NCT06422884
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact that ENV-101 has on lung function and key measures of fibrosis in adult patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Another goal of this study is to better understand the safety and tolerability of ENV-101 in this patient population.
NCT04004936
This research is being conducted to learn which implementation strategy of EQUIPPED is most effective to improve prescribing practices of ED providers toward older Veterans and determine the factors influencing implementation of this program to reduce the prescribing of PIMs to older adults upon discharge from the ED. The study has three research aims. The procedures for these research aims are described below: * Aim 1 - Examining the Impact of Passive Provider Feedback vs. Active Provider Feedback Through a Randomized Trial * Aim 2 - Determination of Factors Affecting Organizational Adoption of EQUIPPED * Aim 3 - Micro-Costing the Active and Passive Feedback Versions of the EQUIPPED Intervention
NCT06847282
The primary goal of this study is to validate motor and functional outcomes and refine clinical trial strategies for pediatric-onset FSHD
NCT04279847
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of INCB057643 as monotherapy or combination with ruxolitinib for participants with myelofibrosis (MF) and other myeloid neoplasms.
NCT04246281
The purpose of this study is to compare standard of care treatments for back pain to electrical stimulation. Stimulation is delivering small amounts of electricity to the nerves in your low back. This study will use a device called the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System. The device is cleared by the FDA for up to 60 days of use for the relief of chronic or acute pain (including back pain)
NCT07429110
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety of the ColoSeal ICD System by evaluating its effectiveness in reducing the stoma creation rate and by comparing the rate of major complications to current standard of care for rectal cancer surgery with a diverting ostomy.
NCT06099769
The researchers are doing this study to find out if the study drug, enzalutamide, alone or combined with the study drug, mifepristone, is effective in treating advanced or metastatic androgen receptor-positive (AR+) triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) or estrogen receptor-low breast cancer (ER-low BC), and whether these study treatments work as well as standard chemotherapy with carboplatin, paclitaxel, capecitabine, or eribulin.
NCT05419492
ENDEAVOR is a Phase 1/2, 2-part, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ETX101 in participants with SCN1A-positive Dravet syndrome aged ≥6 to \<36 months (Part 1A), aged ≥48 months to \<18 years (Part 1B), and aged ≥6 to \<48 months (Part 2). Part 1A follows an open-label, dose-escalation design, Part 1B follows an open-label design, and Part 2 is a randomized, double-blind, sham delayed-treatment control study.
