Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Janne Martikainen, PhD, Professor
CONTACT
Lead
University of Eastern Finland
With
The study addresses an evidence gap: no published pragmatic, randomized trial has directly compared digital lifestyle intervention platforms in a population prospectively risk-stratified through NMR metabolomics in a real-world public-sector setting. PREMAP combines a prospective, population-based cohort (all enrolled participants, followed regardless of risk group) with an embedded pragmatic, open-label, three-arm randomized controlled trial restricted to participants classified as moderate or high multi-disease risk. The non-randomized low-risk group receives its risk result and general health information and is followed as a naturalistic reference group; withholding a risk result or randomizing this group to an active digital intervention was judged neither scientifically nor ethically justified. At the population cohort level, the study evaluates change from baseline to 6 months in the five NMR-derived disease-specific risk predictions and in the WHO-5 wellbeing score across all enrolled participants. Within the embedded randomised substudy, the three digital health arms are compared head-to-head on the same two outcome domains at 6 months, adjusting for guideline-directed medical therapy status and relevant covariates. Secondary objectives include patient-reported outcomes (health-related quality of life, work productivity, health activation, life satisfaction), clinical and health-register-based outcomes (incident diagnoses, new prescriptions, hospitalization, sickness absence) over at least 12 months, and a health economic evaluation using patient-level Monte Carlo microsimulation to estimate cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, from both healthcare payer and societal perspectives.
Age
45–55
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Accepted
