Pilot Study of Normative Range of Field of Binocular Single Vision in Adults in Singapore

The assessment and monitoring of the field of binocular single vision is a crucial aspect of ophthalmological care, particularly in the management of oculoplastics and strabismus. Currently, clinicians worldwide, including those in Singapore, rely on the normal boundary of the field of binocular single vision established by Doctor Robert M. Feibel \& Gill Roper-Hall in 1974 as the gold-standard parameter for clinical assessment. However, this long-standing standard raises several significant concerns regarding its applicability to our current population. The original study by Feibel \& Roper-Hall was conducted in St Louis, Missouri, United States of America, with participants who were likely of Caucasian descent. This demographic composition presents a potential limitation when applying these standards to Asian populations, particularly in Singapore, where ethnic and genetic factors may influence ocular characteristics. Furthermore, the study's methodology involved only "several" normal individuals, suggesting a sample size of more than two but fewer than ten participants. A sample size of this limited scope significantly increases the likelihood of Type II errors, potentially compromising the statistical power and reliability of the established normative values. The temporal gap of over five decades since the original study adds another layer of concern. Population characteristics, environmental factors, and lifestyle patterns have undergone substantial changes during this period, potentially affecting ocular health parameters. Additionally, advances in measurement techniques and an understanding of ocular physiology suggest the need for updated normative data that reflect current population characteristics and incorporate modern assessment methodologies. Given these limitations, there is a pressing need to establish population-specific normative data for the field of binocular single vision in Singapore's adult population. This would not only provide more relevant reference values for clinical assessment but also potentially improve the accuracy of diagnosis and monitoring of various ocular conditions in our local context.