Self-Guided Immersive Virtual Reality Versus Mannequin-based Simulators to Teach the Ultrasound-Guided Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block

This research protocol outlines a single-center, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating immersive virtual reality (iVR) against traditional mannequin-based, high-fidelity simulators (HFS) for training medical personnel in the ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block. This study addresses the suboptimal PNB utilization for hip fracture analgesia, despite evidence supporting their benefits, with fewer than 20% of eligible patients in Ontario and at The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) receiving them due to institutional or provider factors. The primary scientific objective is to ascertain if the novel iVR UGRA simulator, featuring veridical human anatomy and real-time simulated interaction, is non-inferior to HFS for imparting SIFI block skills. Secondary endpoints include assessing iVR tolerability (cybersickness, cognitive load) and collecting formative data for platform iteration. The study cohort will be 36 (target N=40) TOH medical staff and trainees (anesthesiology, emergency medicine, orthopedics), excluding those with \>5 SIFI blocks/year or advanced regional anesthesia training. After informed consent and baseline DASS-21 collection, participants undergo stratified randomization (specialty, PGY level) to the VRS or HFS arm. Both groups receive standardized didactics (SIFI text, videos on ultrasound, needling, sonoanatomy) followed by 60 minutes of self-directed practice with a checklist. The HFS group uses a 3G mannequin and gel part-task trainer. The VRS group uses the VitaSim iVR simulator (designed with cognitive task analysis and functional task alignment), which currently lacks tactile feedback and patient communication modules. Skill assessment occurs pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at a 1-month retention interval, involving SIFI block performance on a hybrid simulator (mannequin/Thiel cadaveric model). Performances are video-recorded for blinded, independent rating by two calibrated assessors. The primary outcome is the UGRA Global Rating Scale (GRS) score. Secondary outcomes include checklist scores, procedural duration, needle passes, simulated IM injections, practice time, and for the VRS group, scores on presence, cognitive load, and cybersickness questionnaires. Sample size (12 per discipline) is based on a non-inferiority margin of 7.6 on the GRS (α=0.05, power=0.9). Statistical analyses via SPSS will include descriptive/inferential statistics (Shapiro-Wilk, t-tests/Wilcoxon, ANCOVA for primary outcome controlling for baseline GRS). Inter-rater reliability uses intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC); significance is p \< 0.05.