The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that women with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia without severe features at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation are usually managed by scheduled induction of labor (IOL). Occasionally, normal pregnant women request elective induction of labor because of a perceived decrease in fetal movements in the presence of normal findings in fetal heart rate monitoring. However, there is limited information available to compare labor induction outcomes between patients with gestational hypertension or mild-preeclampsia and those with normal pregnancies. In addition, no studies have analyzed the characteristics and interventions of labor in hypertensive patients with induction of labor who undergone vaginal birth. Therefore, the purpose of this project was to investigate the differences of labor characteristics and maternal-neonatal outcomes with induction of labour (IOL) between pregnant women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia and those with normotensive pregnancies, providing clinical references of intrapartum management for women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia.
Our results showed that women with hypertensive pregnancies had higher rates of cesarean delivery due to failed induction compared to normotensive pregnancies. However, no significant differences were observed in induced labor characteristics, intrapartum interventions, and maternal-neonatal complications between women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia and those with normotensive pregnancies. Parity, bishop score, birth weight, and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were independently and significantly associated with an increased risk of cesarean section following induction. Consequently, these findings could provide evidence for the intrapartum management of labor induction in women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia.
