In prostate cancer, both in metastatic settings and in many localized cases, androgen suppression via Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonists or antagonists remains the cornerstone of treatment. These androgen deprivation therapies (ADT) aim to reduce circulating androgen levels.
In recent years, Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs) have emerged and are now prescribed in combination with ADT. These treatments have broad indications in metastatic settings and are also increasingly used in localized high-risk prostate cancer.
A conventional distinction is made between abiraterone acetate-a selective inhibitor of androgen synthesis that blocks CYP17-and other ARSIs that inhibit the androgen receptor, namely enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide. The indications for these treatments are often similar, with no clear evidence supporting the superiority of one over another. For instance, in synchronous metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, when treated with ARSIs combined with ADT, clinicians may choose between abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, or enzalutamide. Thus, the safety profile of these agents plays a crucial role in therapeutic decision-making. These next-generation hormonal therapies have significantly improved patient survival.
However, when examining causes of death among patients with prostate cancer, studies have shown that 30% of deaths are due to cardiovascular causes, with an excess risk compared to the general population. It is therefore essential to investigate these cardiovascular events and their associations with the treatments administered.
One meta-analysis identified an increased risk of high-grade cardiovascular toxicities associated with all next-generation hormonal therapies (HR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.50-2.04). This excess risk was observed for each ARSI individually. However, the meta-analysis could not account for patients' cardiovascular history, despite demonstrated associations between pre-existing cardiovascular conditions and the risk of cardiovascular toxicity with abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide.
For these reasons, we aimed to compare cardiovascular toxicities associated with abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide using a large real-world database, taking into account pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities as well as treatment exposure duration.
