Patiromer and Diet/hrQoL in Chronic Dialysis

Hyperkalemia is a major, potentially life-threatening, complication often observed in patients with end-stage kidney disease on chronic renal replacement therapy by extracorporeal hemodialysis. Restriction of dietary potassium intake is a key component of intervention strategies aimed at preventing or treating hyperkalemia and maintaining serum potassium levels in the normal range in patients on chronic dialysis therapy. However, prescription of a restrictive low-potassium diet may preclude the assumption of many potassium-rich foods such as meat, poultry, fish, milk and dairy products, fruits and vegetables and some of these foods must be boiled in water to release their potassium content, which may impact on their palatability. Thus, prescription of a diet with low potassium content may have a major impact on diet palatability and consequently on the patient's perceived quality of life. Moreover it may affect the intake of essential nutrients, such as antioxidant vitamins and fibres and alkali, with slowed intestinal transit and worsening of metabolic acidosis. Diets with restricted potassium content may result in increased sodium content and it is extremely restrictive and difficult to maintain both low potassium and low sodium intake. Finally, dialysis-dependent patients have many other dietary restrictions: they must restrict fluid (which implies not only restrictions in water and other fluids intake but also in the intake of soups and most fruits and vegetables) and sodium (which considerably affects diet palatability) intake, to prevent fluid overload and blood pressure increase with increased risk of pulmonary congestion, dyspnoea and need for additional dialysis sessions. They also must limit phosphate intake (which implies restriction of food that is particularly rich in essential nutrients such as milk and most cheeses) to prevent mineral bone disease and vascular calcifications, because phosphate is poorly cleared during the dialysis session. Finally, they also must reduce saturated fat intake because they are at increased risk of atherosclerotic disease and cardiovascular complications. Thus, potassium intake restriction is one of the several dietary restrictions that altogether have a major impact on diet palatability. Thus, the possibility to limit or avoid dietary potassium restriction would be a great relief for patients and would also have a major impact on their health status. Historically, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) or Kayexalate® (Sanofi-Aventis S.p.A) - a resin that exchanges potassium for sodium in the large intestine - has been used as an oral potassium binder to help reduce serum potassium levels when dietary potassium restriction is not sufficient to prevent hyperkalemia or when compliance to low-potassium diet is not adequate. This medication was released into the market prior to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) creation, thus rigorous clinical trials to evaluate the risk/benefit profile of the drug are lacking, particularly in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). SPS is a sodium-exchange resin that promotes excretion of potassium in the colon lumen with voluminous stool output and a propensity for diarrhea that is not well tolerated by most patients. In fact, in everyday clinical practice long-term SPS therapy can be associated with volume overload, hypernatremia and gastrointestinal intolerance. These side effects, in addition to the poor palatability of the resin, explain the poor compliance to the drug that is spontaneously interrupted by the majority of patients within a few weeks or months. Moreover, a Swedish observational analysis in adults with at least CKD stage IV showed that SPS treatment is associated with an excess risk of hospitalizations or death due to intestinal ischemia or thrombosis, gastrointestinal ulcers and perforation. Thus, in 2009 the FDA released a black box warning for SPS based on accumulating data showing a high incidence of colonic necrosis attributable to this compound, an event that is fatal in one-third of cases. CKD has been identified as one independent risk factor for gastrointestinal injury upon exposure to SPS. Thus, novel, safer and better-tolerated therapeutic options for the management of hyperkalemia are needed, particularly for patients with CKD. A newer potassium binder, patiromer, has been approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of hyperkalemia. Patiromer is an organic, non-absorbed, sodium-free, potassium-binding polymer that exchanges potassium for calcium in the gastrointestinal tract. It has been evaluated in phase 2 and phase 3 trials showing excellent potassium-lowering efficacy, a highly predictable dose-response relationship, and a favorable side effect profile in patients with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy (AMETHYST-DN trial), heart failure with history of hyperkalemia resulting in discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors (PEARL-HF trial) or stage 3-4 CKD already treated with RAAS blockers (OPAL-HK trial). More recently, an observational outcome analysis of patients with hyperkalemia who were referred to a wide network of US dialysis centers, found that compared to a 3-month pre-index period, the occurrence and frequency of potassium baths (1K) decreased in the 3 months after initiating patiromer for hyperkalemia treatment. Consistently, 6-month patiromer treatment (8.4 g once a day or four times a week) significantly decreased serum potassium levels in 269 dialysis patients with hyperkalemia. Notably no serious adverse events have been reported with long-term use of patiromer after its introduction into the market. The most commonly reported non-serious adverse events include hypomagnesemia, diarrhea, constipation, nausea and abdominal discomfort6, events that however require treatment withdrawal in only 3% of patients. Because of the remarkably good risk/benefit profile, experts of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies looking at all the available data and studies concerning potassium outcomes and treatment options, recommended including newer potassium-binding agents such as patiromer to treat hyperkalemia. Notably, patiromer compared to other potassium binders such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate differs by exchange ion: calcium and sodium, respectively. The use of calcium rather than sodium as exchange ion may prevent the risk of sodium readsorption and secondary fluid overload that may result in excess risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization because of heart failure in patients with or without pre-existing left ventricular dysfuction. Consistently, it is conceivable that in dialysis patients excess gastrointestinal sodium reabsorption could result in increased water intake, fluid overload and heart failure requiring fluid ultrafiltration during the dialysis session with consequent cardiovascular instability and complications. On the other hand, it is clearly demonstrated that Patiromer administered daily significantly and safely prevents hyperkalemia (with a trend to less hyperkalemia-related arrythmias) in ESKD patients on chronic dialysis therapy. The patiromer serum potassium lowering effects are confirmed by an observational, retrospective analysis showing that in 10854 patients on stable, chronic hemodialysis therapy since at least 90 days, after initiation of patiromer supplementation to prevent hyperkalemia, the percentage of patients with pre-dialysis serum potassium level \< 5.5 mEq/L nearly doubled from 35.5% at baseline to 70.1% at 12 months. This increase (to 62.8%) was already apparent at two months of treatment and was observed without systematically introducing changes in diet, dialytic procedures and concomitant potassium-modifying. Another retrospective, observational, real-world study found that 3-month treatment with patiromer was associated with an average (and significant) 0.5 mEq/L decrease in serum potassium levels in 527 chronic dialysis patients referred to 2400 dialysis clinics in the United States. The results regarding dose and duration of use suggest that the providers' intention for chronic patiromer use rather than for acute or short-term potassium control18. Finally, a randomized placebo trial including also a sub-group of patients with CKD on chronic dialysis therapy showed that daily doses adjusted up to 25.2 grams according to a predefined titration algorithm (as in our present study) were safe and well tolerated over a 5-week period. No treatment-related serious adverse event was reported. Constipation and diarrhea were reported as treatment related non-serious adverse events in a few patients. Thus, the remarkably good risk/benefit profile of patiromer in chronic hemodialysis patients provides a robust background to test in the context of a prospective, randomized controlled trial whether the potassium binding properties of patiromer can be instrumental to maintain serum potassium levels in the normal range with less restrictive (and even without) low-potassium diets and consequently improved patient-perceived quality of life. These effects are expected to translate into improved patient mental and physical health.