Pro-Epileptic Effects of IV Ketamine

Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the first group received IV ketamine at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg, the second group received IV midazolam at a titrated dose of 0.15-0.40 mg/kg, and the third group received IV propofol at a titrated dose of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Procedural sedation in all groups was supplemented with IV fentanyl, administered in small incremental boluses of 25-50 mcg to ensure adequate analgesia. Baseline EEG recordings were obtained for all patients prior to the procedure. During the procedure, EEG recordings, vital parameters-including blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate-and the depth of sedation were continuously monitored for all participants. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) Scale was used to evaluate the depth of sedation. The MOAA/S scale was applied as follows: Score 5: Alert; responds readily to name spoken in a normal tone. Score 4: Mild sedation; lethargic response to name spoken in a normal tone. Score 3: Moderate sedation; responds only after the name is spoken loudly and/or repeatedly. Score 2: Deep sedation; responds only after mild prodding or shaking. Score 1: Very deep sedation; unresponsive to physical stimulation. The target sedation level for patients was maintained between 2 and 3, depending on the procedural requirements. If necessary, the drug dose was carefully adjusted to increase or decrease sedation while ensuring the depth of sedation did not drop to level 1. EEG recordings for all patients were performed. Electrodes were placed on the scalp according to the International 10-20 system, with 19 electrodes and 1 reference electrode, and the impedance of each electrode was maintained below 5 kilo-ohms. EEG recordings began with a 5-minute baseline recording during wakefulness, followed by continuous monitoring during the induction phase (administration of sedative drugs), and an additional 10-minute recording after sedation was achieved. Upon completion of the procedural intervention, EEG recordings were repeated for 10 minutes during the awakening phase and calm wakefulness. After data collection, all EEG recordings were visually analyzed by a clinical neurophysiologist blinded to the administered drugs. EEG signals were evaluated using filters set between 0.5-70 Hz and a bipolar montage (double banana). Large-amplitude waves (\>100 μV) were considered artifacts, and artifacts caused by eyelid or ocular movements were excluded from the analysis. The recordings were analyzed for basic EEG activity, including alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (13-25 Hz), theta (4-7 Hz), delta (0.5-3.5 Hz), and gamma (25-40 Hz) rhythms, suppression-burst patterns, and their topographies. The presence of interictal epileptiform discharges, such as focal and/or generalized spike-wave, sharp wave, spike-slow wave, sharp-slow wave, and multiple spike-slow wave patterns, was noted. Additionally, clinical and/or subclinical ictal activity was documented. Demographic data, including age, sex, comorbidities, and body weight, as well as vital parameters recorded before and during the procedure, EEG findings, and adverse effects following IV treatment, were systematically recorded.