There is sparse evidence on the effectiveness of first-line treatment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) regarding clinical- and cost-effectiveness.
The Better Hip trial is a multicenter, stratified (by hospital site), randomized (allocation 1:1), controlled, assessor blinded, superiority trial conducted in Denmark (Aarhus, Horsens, Aalborg, and Odense) and Australia (Melbourne). Eligible patients will either be randomized to a supervised strength exercise intervention or to usual care. The primary outcome will be hip-related quality of life measured at end of intervention (6 months) with the iHOT-33. A health economic evaluation will assess the difference in cost-effectiveness between groups from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12- months after initiating the intervention for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and at baseline and 6-months for objective outcome measures obtained at clinical assessments.
This trial aims to investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a supervised strength exercise intervention compared to usual care as first-line treatment in patients with FAIS. A secondary aim is to explore how exercise adherence and dosage of a supervised strength exercise intervention mediates outcomes.
The investigators hypothesis that;
1. 6-months of supervised strength exercise intervention is superior (i.e., at least 6 points, on a scale from 0-100) to usual care in improving hip related quality of life in patients with FAIS at the end of intervention.
2. 6-months of supervised strength exercise intervention is cost-effective compared to usual first-line care at 12-month follow-up in patients with FAIS.
3. High exercise adherence and dosage will be superior to low exercise adherence and dosage in mediating clinical effectiveness in patients with FAIS.
A full trial protocol will be published and made publicly available prior to analysis for the primary paper. All primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed with the intention-to-treat principle. Supplementary to the intention-to-treat analysis a per protocol analysis will be conducted. Between-group differences will be analyzed using a linear mixed effect model for continuous outcomes and a logistical mixed effect model for binary outcome variables. Intervention group, recruitment site and time will be included as fixed effects and patients will be included as a random effect. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) will be calculated by dividing the difference in costs by the difference in effects (quality-adjusted life years for cost-utility and iHOT-33 for cost-effectiveness)
