The study population is randomized and participants are chosen based on the diagnosis of chronic heart failure. After participants were informed and consented by telephone and in writing, secondary data were collected (primary etiology of disease, age, height, weight, BMI, medication). Patients were randomized and the study bread was prepared by a baker. Only the baker was aware of which bread was the normal bread and which was the study bread. Both loaves were labeled. Participants, investigators and outcome assessors were blinded to the assignment.
The study was a crossover study. The participants were followed for a period of 12 weeks, during which they took 6 weeks of low-salt bread and 6 weeks of normal bread. A minimum intake of 4-5 slices of bread per day was requested for participation in the study. Two different loaves were made; a loaf with 0.35 grams of salt per slice of bread (normal) and a loaf with 0.05 grams of salt per slice of bread (low salt content). Based on an average bread intake of 4-5 slices per day, a clinically relevant difference in sodium excretion between the interventions of 1.2-1.5 grams per day was expected. Patients were informed by telephone and in writing about the need to eat at least 4 slices of bread per day. It was expressly stated that if the patient could not achieve this, participation was not possible.
These intervention groups are thus as follows:
* Group 1: starts with the Scelta bread with a normal amount of sodium (0.4 grams sodium per slice)
* Group 2: starts with the low sodium Scelta bread (0.1 gram sodium per slice). During this period, the subjects kept a food diary 1 day per week (12 days in total).
At three different times there were contact moments (45 minutes) with the patient and data were collected consisting of: 15 minutes blood pressure measurement, collection of 24-hour urine, body weight and bioimpedance measurement, a short physical examination, filling in questionnaire about quality of life and nutrition and finally a blood test. The included patients were also seen by the dietitian immediately after contact with the researcher. They also received dietary advice regarding salt restriction.
Inclusion criteria
Patients may participate if they meet the following criteria:
* Age over 18 years
* Heart failure NYHA class III-IV or LVEF \< 35%, in a stable condition (no medication changes in the past two weeks)
* Being able to issue written informed consent
* Dutch speaking and reading
Exclusion criteria
Patients may not participate in the study if they meet the following criteria:
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Participate in another study during the intervention
* Hyponatraemia \< 130 mmol/L
* Hypokalaemia \< 3.4 mmol/l
* Hyperkaliemia \> 5.5 mmol/l
* Cognitive Impairment
* Blood pressure systolic below 100 mmHg or diastolic below 50 mmHg
* Allergic reaction to mushrooms, silica, corn and gluten
* Life expectancy shorter than one year.
Variables Primary variable The primary endpoint of this study is the reduction of salt intake. This is assessed with the oral intake of salt, which will be determined using a food diary kept by the participant. The participant's compliance can also be viewed here. This is compared to the amount of sodium in the urine. It is hypothesized that the use of low-salt bread leads to a reduction in total daily salt intake, resulting in decreased urinary sodium excretion.
Secondary Variables
The secondary variables are:
* Blood pressure
* Weight
* Body composition and fluid status (intra and extra cellular) by means of a Body Composition Monitor (BCM measurement)
* Venous blood: sodium, BNP
* Symptoms of heart failure according to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire
* Taste of bread
Data collection The diet of the participants was examined together with the dietician on the first outpatient visit. Any details were discussed immediately and advice followed if necessary. The patients all kept a food diary in which they wrote down all oral intake one day a week. They were also asked to record the oral intake the day before the outpatient visit. In this way the dietitian could calculate the salt intake and this could be compared with the sodium in the urine.
Blood pressure was measured three times over a period of 15 minutes. The last measured blood pressure was used in the analysis.
The fluid balance (intra and extra cellular volume) was measured using a Body Composition Monitor (BCM measurement) from Fresenius Medical care. This is a bioimpedance spectroscopy device for clinical use, validated with isotope dilution methods. The 'overhydration' parameter was used for the follow-up. Overhydration represents the excess fluid that is almost exclusively stored in a patient's extracellular volume and is therefore part of the 'extracellular water' (ECW).
Labs were taken from patients during each outpatient visit. Several determinations were made for this. In order to answer the question, the BNP and sodium were considered the most important in this study. The biologically active B-type natriuretic peptide or brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the biologically inactive N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) are substances produced by the heart that are released into the circulation and mainly provide information about the filling pressures of the heart . The accuracy of BNP plasma levels for the diagnosis of heart failure is comparable to that of NT-proBNP plasma levels.
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire was designed in 1984 to measure the effects of heart failure and heart failure treatments on an individual's quality of life. The content of the questionnaire was chosen to be representative of the ways in which heart failure can affect key physical, emotional, social and mental dimensions of quality of life. The list has been developed for use in daily practice. To measure the effects of symptoms, functional limitations, and psychological stress of heart failure on quality of life, the MLHFQ asks each person to rate, using a 6-point (zero to five) scale, how much each of its 21 facets interferes with them. in daily life. The questionnaire assesses the impact of frequent physical symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, peripheral edema and difficulty sleeping - and psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression. In addition, the effects of heart failure on physical and social functioning are also included in the measuring instrument. Because treatments may have side effects in addition to the symptoms and functional limitations of heart failure, questions about drug side effects, hospital stays, and costs of care were also included to help measure the overall impact of treatment on quality of life. Although the MLHFQ contains relevant aspects of the main dimensions of quality of life, the questionnaire was not designed to measure any particular dimension in isolation. The total score is presented in mean SD. The intervention group is compared with the control group. The NYHA classification is also reviewed with every outpatient check.
