Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Keep this study
Lead
University of Zurich
With
McGill University
University of Michigan
University of Calgary
Cook Children's Health Care System
St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
Mayo Clinic
Thomas Jefferson University
UMC Utrecht
Schweizerisches Epilepsie Zentrum
We use an automated data-independent prospective definition of clinically relevant HFO that has been validated in data from two independent epilepsy centers. In this study, we combine retrospectively collected datasets from 9 independent epilepsy centers. The analysis is blinded to clinical outcome. We use iEEG recordings during NREM sleep with a minimum of 12 epochs of 5 minutes of NREM sleep. We automatically detect HFO in the ripple (80-250 Hz) and in the fast ripple (250-500 Hz) band. There is no manual rejection of events in this fully automated algorithm. The type of HFO that we consider clinically relevant is defined as the simultaneous occurrence of a fast-ripple and a ripple. We calculate the temporal consistency of each patient's HFO rates over several data epochs within and between nights. Patients with temporal consistency \< 50% are excluded from further analysis. We determine whether all electrode contacts with high HFO rate are included in the resection volume and whether seizure freedom (ILAE 1) was achieved at ≥2 y follow-up.
Applying a previously validated algorithm to a large cohort from several independent epilepsy centers may advance the clinical relevance and the generalizability of HFO analysis as essential next step for use of HFO in clinical practice.
Age
Any age
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
You may be eligible if
Data as provided from the participating center
Clareo Health | Multicenter Comparison of Interictal HFO as a Predictor of Seizure Freedom