Before the advent of the first targeted therapies with imatinib in 2000, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was the most feared myeloproliferative syndrome (MPS, Philadelphia+), with a median survival of 3 years. Apart from a small percentage of patients who do not respond or respond poorly to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the probability of survival is now very close to that of the general population when patients are on lifelong TKI therapy (leukemic stem cells have low sensitivity to TKIs). Some patients with good response to treatment are likely to consider stopping treatment but just over 50% of them will have to resume it. So many patients will have to take TKIs for life, which poses several problems:
1. \- intolerance to the various molecules depending on the toxicity of each one,
2. \- development of resistance to TKIs, characterized by a rise in the percentage of BcrAbl1 fusion RNA, despite treatment or increased dosages.
There are many causes of these resistances including those known for any molecule:
* pharmacokinetic causes which can be evaluated by the plasma dosage of the molecules;
* Leukemic cell-related causes: passage into the cell depending on antagonism between influx pump (hOct1) and efflux pumps (MDR1) and failure to bind to the BcrAbl1 target (pharmacodynamics), mainly by mutation of the tyrosine kinase domain of Abl1, exceptionally by amplification of the Abl1 gene.
These apply to the consolidation phase of Phi+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Phi+ALL).
Mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of BcrAbl1 account for approximately 25 - 30% of the causes of first line treatment resistance, but can reach 50 - 60% of resistance in 2nd line treatment.The presence of these mutations requires a change of molecule, when possible. More than 100 TKD mutations have been described. The development/selection of these mutations affects both first-generation TKIs (imatinib) and second-generation TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib and bosutinib). Resistance mutations are even emerging for the third-generation TKIs (ponatinib). Sensitivity profiles are therefore available to help choose the right molecules beyond first-line treatment.
Among all these mutations, some are particularly fearsome such as T315I (only sensitive to ponatinib) or T315M or L (resistant to all molecules, including ponatinib). Nîmes University Hospital is one of the seven centers of the 2005 STIC program devoted to searching for TDK mutations. In 2018, we had detected 93 different mutations in 68 patients with resistance mutations, including 23 cases of T315I, by low-sensitivity techniques (Sanger sequencing).
We now have a far more sensitive method involving the use of Next Generation Sequencing, coupled with very high fidelity Polymerase Chain Reactions offering new perspectives.
CD8+ T cells are classically involved in tumor control. This has led to a promising new approach to the treatment of tumors: immunotherapy targeting inhibitory receptors or "immune checkpoints" (CTLA4, PD1 or its ligand PDL1 for example). These are negative feedback pathways set up following prolonged T cell activation. When T lymphocytes are stimulated over long periods they begin to express this type of receptor on their surface. These inhibitory receptors inhibit T cell functioning and proliferation. Antibodies targeting these receptors block this negative feedback pathway, thereby enhancing T cell activity. Because lymphocytes directed against tumor antigens overexpress these inhibitory receptors, administration of antibodies targeting them can enhance anti-tumor immune activity and, in some patients, induce tumor regression.
Classically, the presence of a type T315I mutation is associated with an explosive increase in the rates of BcrAbl1 linked to a progression of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. This was also the case for other mutations like E255K. Thus, we have a few cases of "atypical" T315I with BcrAbl1 levels lower than or equal to 1% and a percentage of T315I close to 100% for more than one year or a patient with a BcrAbl1 level of around 1% for more than 2 years and carrying a T315I at 5%.
So it seems that the mere presence of certain mutations such as T315I does not explain the progression of the disease alone. This explosive progression might be linked to a second event (at least) specific to the leukemic cell, such as the mutation of another gene (not yet described) or linked to the environment of the leukemic cell, such as control by the immune system.
The "atypical" evolution of these TKI resistance mutations, particularly T315I, which is as frequent as it is frightening, could be controlled by these innate CD8+ T cells. This would explain the long periods (up to more than 2 years documented) of the presence of clones carrying these mutations with no marked disease progression, except, exclusively on a molecular level, a BcrAbl1 level close to 1%.
The aim of this project is to test whether low levels of BcrAbl1, despite the presence of resistance mutations, are related to high levels of innate CD8+ T cells, in the hypothesis that these cells have an anti-tumor role. This research aims to investigate:
* An association between the rate of innate CD8+ T cells and the evolution of Phi+ pathologies (Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive Acute lymphocytic leukemia (Phi+ ALL) carrying a resistance mutation, according to the ELN 2013 and PFi-LMC recommendations.
* An association between the level of innate CD8+ T cells and the expansion of TKI resistance clones, assessed as the number of BcrAbl1 copies carrying the mutation relative to the number of Abl1 copies.
