Purpose: To prospectively determine patients' quality of life (QOL) and treatment-related toxicity outcomes with adjuvant multimodality treatment (chemotherapy and radiation treatment) in women with advanced endometrial carcinoma after surgical staging.
Specific Aims:
1. To prospectively determine QOL after adjuvant treatment using the prospectively-validated FACT questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgical staging
2. To prospectively determine the rate of any grade 2 or higher treatment-related side effects: mainly bone marrow suppression, lymphedema, diarrhea, and others. Additionally, we will collect information about the rate of completion of planned adjuvant treatment (number of chemotherapy cycles, dose reduction or chemotherapy delay, radiation treatment interruption, etc.).
3. To prospectively collect survival outcome endpoints after adjuvant treatment (recurrence-free, disease-specific and overall survival).
Introduction and Rationale: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and ranks second in gynecologic cancer mortality following only ovarian cancer. More than 84% of patients present with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-II disease. By definition, patients with advanced-stage uterine carcinoma (FIGO stages III-IV) are those with extrauterine disease and are at significant risk of dying from uterine cancer. They constitute a very heterogeneous group of patients with varying risk factors yielding highly variable clinical outcomes. Within the same FIGO stage, patients with disease involving multiple extrauterine sites fare worse compared to patients with involvement of a single site (1).
Postoperatively, patients with advanced stage disease often require adjuvant therapy(s) to reduce the chance of tumor recurrence with the potential to improve survival. However, the optimal adjuvant therapy is yet to be established with several options available for adjuvant treatment.
Rationale for multimodality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation treatment (CMT):
Current treatment recommendations for advanced stage endometrial cancer consist of multiple approaches including chemotherapy alone, radiotherapy (RT) alone, or combined modality treatment (CMT) (2).
GOG 122 study, which was a phase III trial, randomized patient with advanced endometrial carcinoma to adjuvant chemotherapy alone versus whole abdomen RT (WART). Outcomes of this study showed that the chemotherapy arm had an improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to RT alone. However, this trial showed that if chemotherapy is given alone, that rate of local recurrence approaches 20% (3).
The safety of CMT with concurrent chemotherapy and RT (chemoRT) was explored in RTOG 9708, which was a phase II trial that evaluated outcomes in patients receiving concurrent chemoRT. All patients received adjuvant pelvic RT (45 Gy) concurrent with cisplatin followed by four additional cycles of cisplatin and paclitaxel. The 4-year OS and PFS for patients with stage III disease were 77% and 72%, respectively. Rates of grade 1 toxicity were found in 16% of patients, grade 2 in 41%, grade 3 in 16%, and grade 4 in 5%. This study demonstrated that concurrent chemoRT is safe with excellent local control (4).
More recent studies have sought to compare chemoRT to chemotherapy or radiation alone. PORTEC-3 was a phase III randomized trial comparing adjuvant RT alone to concurrent chemoRT. The RT dose was 48.6 Gy in 27 fractions and chemotherapy was concurrent cisplatin followed by an additional 4 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. For women with stage III disease, the addition of chemotherapy to radiation treatment showed benefit in terms of improvement in FFS. An analysis of toxicity outcomes found that 60% of patients in the chemoRT arm experienced a grade 3 or greater adverse event compared to 12% in the RT alone arm (p\<0.0001) (5).
GOG 258 study was recently published and was similar to PORTEC-3 except that it compared concurrent chemoRT to adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Patients were randomized to receive concurrent chemoRT (45 Gy in 25 fractions concurrent with cisplatin followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel) or chemotherapy alone. The results of this study showed that chemoRT was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of vaginal and regional lymphatic recurrence. However, distant recurrence rates were higher in the chemoRT arm compared to chemotherapy alone (6).
The above studies helped to establish concurrent chemoRT with cisplatin followed by adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel as a valid adjuvant treatment approach for women with advanced endometrial carcinoma.
A retrospective review from Washington University included 51 women with stage III-IV endometrial carcinoma who received CMT with carboplatin/paclitaxel-based regimen concurrent with RT and assessed survival and toxicity outcomes. The chemotherapy regimen given was carboplatin/paclitaxel for 4-6 cycles and RT was 48-51.2 Gy. Patients also received a vaginal brachytherapy boost. They found that 48 patients (94%) completed chemotherapy and 16 patients (30%) required chemotherapy dose-reduction. Thirty-four patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicities, most of which were hematologic. Over 80% of patients required leukocyte growth factor injections. There were seven late grade 3-4 toxicities (4 GI, 2 GU, and 1 ongoing neuropathy). They found a median PFS of 42.8 months, median OS of 44.9 months, and 3-year OS of 80% (7). This study suggests that concurrent chemoRT using a carbotaxol-based regimen has favorable outcomes, a tolerable side effect profile, and the potential to reduce overall treatment duration.
Building off of the results of the above retrospective study as well as the aforementioned randomized trials, we wish to prospectively assess outcomes of women with advanced endometrial carcinoma who receive the same concurrent chemoRT with a carboplatin/paclitaxel-based regimen.
