Loading clinical trials...

Multi Point Pacing vs. Conventional STUDY PROTOCOL | Clinical Trials | Clareo Health

WITHDRAWNNANCT04334018

Multi Point Pacing vs. Conventional STUDY PROTOCOL

The Purpose of this study is to compare two programming modalities for CRT devices in Heart Failure patients with an indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Lead sponsor: CMC Ambroise Paré•6 locations•View source on ClinicalTrials.gov

Clareo plain-language summary

What this study is about

Generating AI summary...

Save this trial guide to your notes

Keep your clinical trial research organized — questions to ask, what to expect, and key details.

Trial snapshot

StatusWITHDRAWN

PhaseNA

Enrollment—

Start dateMar 2018

Last updatedApr 3, 2020

Locations shown

PHc hôpital d'Antibes la Fontonne

Antibes

Centre hospitalier de Cannes

Cannes

CMC Ambroise Paré

Neuilly-sur-Seine

For caregivers

Use Clareo to keep notes, questions, trial details, and next steps organized before and after appointments.

Start free trial →

Data Source & Attribution

This clinical trial information is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov, a service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

ClinicalTrials.gov last update: April 3, 2020Data synced to Clareo: June 28, 2026

Modifications: This data has been reformatted for display purposes. Eligibility criteria have been parsed into inclusion/exclusion sections. Location data has been geocoded to enable distance-based search. For the authoritative and most current information, please visit ClinicalTrials.gov.

Neither the United States Government nor Clareo Health make any warranties regarding the data. Check ClinicalTrials.gov frequently for updates.

View ClinicalTrials.gov Terms and Conditions