A2ALL-Patients Safety System Improvements in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

This is an observational as well as a time-controlled study to be conducted at four participating A2ALL Deux Transplant Centers (TCs). The study is divided into three phases: an observational phase (Aim 1) to conduct a comprehensive and proactive patient safety risk assessment to describe preventable complications, near miss events, medical errors and hazardous conditions and in the delivery of standard of care to living donor liver transplant (LDLT) donors and recipients from the time of admission for the LDLT surgery through discharge after LDLT surgery. The in depth observational phase continues throughout the study and is scheduled to be completed by the end of the study (May 2015). In phase 2-solution development and implementation phase (Aim 2): two high priority areas of care were identified for in depth assessment and solution development. The selection of the two high priority areas of LDLT standard of care was guided by the identification of vulnerabilities in the systems and processes of care with a high incidence and severity of related preventable complications and medical errors across the four participating A2ALL Deux TCs. To date, multiple priority areas were identified, based on the ongoing review of medical records (e.g., transition of care, glucose control, donor pain management, preoperative OR set-up). The participating A2ALL Deux TCs agreed to focus on an in depth assessment of the two areas that demonstrated high incidence and high severity of preventable complications and medical errors: 1) donor pain management and 2) preoperative OR set-up process. 1. Donor Pain Management: Upon further investigation, it was identified that living liver donors experience significant amount of pain, in the early postoperative period but also especially a few days after donation. Data from the four participating A2ALL Deux TCs reveal a 20% incidence, overall, of respiratory complications (e.g. re-intubation, requirement for application of Naloxone, etc.) directly related to the opioid use in the present LDLT standard of care for donor pain management. Based on these data, clinicians at the four participating A2ALL Deux TCs, in consultation with an international pain expert with particular expertise in transplantation (Paul White, MD University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas), developed an evidence-based donor pain management solution with the aim of reducing preventable complications as well as improving the donor pain experience. This evidence-based donor pain management solution was developed over months through in-person and telephone meetings of transplant surgeons, hepatologists, anesthesiologists and acute pain specialists from all four participating A2ALL Deux TCs, in addition to the research teams. Consensus has been reached on the key elements of the evidence-based donor pain management solution and all four participating A2ALL Deux TCs are poised to begin implementation. 2. Preoperative OR Set-up Process: Preventable complications, near miss events, medical errors and hazardous conditions related to the preoperative OR set-up processes were identified. The four participating A2ALL Deux TCs will need to engage in additional review of the detailed assessment of the standardization and optimization of the preoperative OR set-up process and then, will collaboratively design a standardized process over a four month period (expected conclusion mid February 2014 in order to incorporate what occurs at the Collaborative at each site and overall). Solutions will be designed collaboratively to reduce the incidence and severity of related medical errors and preventable complications together with the TCs and their staff. The measurement of solution impact to reduce preventable complications and medical errors (Aim 3) involves the implementation of the two collaboratively developed solutions: (1) Evidence-based donor pain management solution and (2) Standardization and optimization of the preoperative OR set-up process. During this phase relevant metrics pre- and post-implementation will be compared to assess the effectiveness of the implemented solutions.