The Living Kidney Donor Safety Study

Transplantation is the preferred treatment option for patients with kidney failure. Compared to dialysis, patients who receive a transplant have a substantial reduction in the risk of death, an improved quality of life, and decreased health care costs. The demand for kidneys has resulted in long waiting lists for deceased donor kidneys. Therefore, living kidney donations have been on the increase over the years in order to meet this demand for kidneys. Living donation also has the added benefit of a shorter waiting time, increased graft success and increased recipient survival compared to deceased donor transplantation. Aside from the advantages for the recipient, living transplantation is a complex medical practice which we must conduct in a safe and ethical manner. The premise for accepting living donors is that the "minimal" risk of short and long-term medical harm realized by the donor is outweighed by the definite advantages to the recipient and potential psychosocial benefits of altruism to the donor. The short-term potential medical consequences for living kidney donors have been well established. Yet, the long-term implications of living kidney donation are far less certain. Potential medical risks include hypertension, reduced kidney function, albuminuria, premature cardiovascular disease, and death. Estimates of these outcomes vary substantially in the literature. As well, the potential long-term medical risks are also communicated inconsistently across transplant communities. It is accepted that most living donors experience increased self-esteem, feelings of well-being and an improved quality of life after their altruistic act. However, some donors have negative psychosocial outcomes which require further clarification. There is also a financial burden to the donor from the donation process. Concerns about future life, disability, and medical insurance have been raised. These issues will be addressed through this research study on the long term implications of donation. A better understanding of post-donation risk and the timing of new disease onset is critical for donor selection, informed consent, and follow-up. The study will assess the attributable risk of living kidney donation using study techniques that meet modern criteria for high methodological quality. Non-donors will have similar indicators of baseline health as donors and will complete the same schedule of follow-up assessments. Data was collected as follows: 1. Pre-donation/baseline (informed consent was obtained, eligibility was assessed, surveys were completed, a basic physical exam was completed, blood and urine samples were collected and training on the home blood pressure machine was completed). This occurred for both donors and non-donor controls either on site or long distance. 2. Three months post-donation (mailed 3 month surveys) 3. Annual post-donation follow-up visits (mailed surveys and blood pressure machine, lab testing completed). The number of annual follow-up visits varied depending on the year of nephrectomy, or simulated nephrectomy year for controls (between 5 years to 15 years) Living kidney donation is practiced with the expectation that minimal risks of donor harm are outweighed by psychological benefits of altruism to the donor and improved recipient health. Our multicentre prospective cohort study of living kidney donors will inform the practice and safety of living kidney donation, including transplant center medical policies on donor selection, patient counseling, informed consent, and long-term patient follow-up and care.