Finding studies
Finding studies
Take this into the appointment.
Saves the questions and what to expect into your notes, next to the visit they belong to.
Lead
Boehringer Ingelheim
This is a 16-week, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study of 4-week randomised treatment periods to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of 5 ug of Ba 679 BR inhalation solution from Respimat compared to tiotropium inhalation powder capsule (18 ug) via HandiHaler in patients with COPD. The two 4-week randomised treatment periods are separated by 4-week washout period. Study Hypothesis: The primary aim of this trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of lung function response to 5 ug (2 actuations of 2.5 ug) of Ba679BR Respimat delivered by the Respimat inhaler once daily compared to tiotropium (18 ug) inhaled as powder capsule from the HandiHaler once daily at the end of 4-week treatment periods in patients with COPD. The hypothesis test of non-inferiority will be performed at alpha = 0.025 (one-sided). Comparison(s): The primary efficacy endpoint is the trough FEV1 response determined at the end of each 4-week period of randomised treatment.
Age
40–any
Sex
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
