Objective:
1. To assess the cranial and extracranial infection rate of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis versus antibiotics-impregnated catheter.
2. To assess the patients' outcome and carry out cost analysis for systemic antibiotic prophylaxis versus antibiotics-impregnated catheter.
Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial
Hypothesis: The use of antibiotics-impregnated catheter instead of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis will not increase the rate of cerebrospinal fluid infection, will decrease the rate of opportunistic/nosocomial infection and improves the overall outcome in these patients; that would convert into a reduction in treatment cost of these patients.
Method: After ventricular catheter insertion, patients will be randomized into one of the two groups:
1. Periprocedural antibiotics: Only ie Unasyn and Rocephin and insertion of the antibiotics-impregnated ventricular catheter.
2. Periprocedural antibiotics and prophylactic dual antibiotics ie Unasyn and Rocephin and insertion of ventricular catheter without impregnation of antibiotics.
Primary outcome variable: Cerebrospinal fluid infection and extracranial infection.
Sample size: We aim to recruit a total of 180 patients with 90 patients in each arm and expect to complete patient recruitment in 2-3 years. The calculation is based to detect a difference of nosocomial infection rate between 20% and 40%, with 5% level of significance and 80% power.
Projected results and significance:
The project has a good chance to be the first clinical study to the outcome and cost impacts of antibiotic-impregnated ventricular catheter.
